Monday, December 19, 2011

What I learned from my 94 year old mother-in-law about heaven

Secret admirers are nice, I suppose. I don't know for sure, of course, because if I ever had one the secret was carefully kept. But just yesterday a colleague of my wife's (unknown to me until that moment as a reader of my scratchings) told me to get on with it and finish my wonderings about heaven. "Quit leaving me in suspense," she actually said.

Well, having not quite reached Christopher Hitchens' stature, I'll take whatever adulation that I can muster, along with a much longer life than poor Hitchens was given I hope. So here you go, dear friend--what I deduce about heaven from watching my sainted mother-in-law of four score and fourteen years.

Mom still has most of the marbles she ever had, I would say. They may move somewhat more slowly in the bag, but I don't think many have escaped. She doesn't suffer from senility. She still does some cooking for herself. She reads the local paper to keep up with the goings on in our city in the country. Some tasks, especially mending and helping with food preparation for family events, are still well within her capabilities.

But like most people who reach a certain age, she suffers from short-term memory loss. I'm 30 years younger than Mom is. I was once the proud possessor of the acute Sutherland memory, as was my father before me. But I watched the erosion of Dad's ability to hang onto the remnants of events, and I know that even now my memory is not what it once was. It comes to us all.

Therefore, I find that while Mom can still remember where she was on her fourteenth birthday, she can't always recall what she did yesterday. It sometimes makes me wonder whether it matters that we do something with her, or for her, if soon the pleasure it brought her will slip through her grasp. We still involve her in various events as often as possible, nonetheless, hoping that it keeps her spirits up even if the details are sometimes long gone.

And that brings me to the issue of continuity. Suppose we were to arrive at those Pearly Gates with only very early memories of what we did for our allotted time on earth, with the rest being a blank like my mother-in-law. Or what if heaven were like birth; i.e., we arrive like newborns with no memory of the nine months in the womb (or ninety-four years on earth) as background and context for what happens next. Surely that would make a mockery of all the striving we did on behalf of the Kingdom of God while we were here. Self-denial, putting the kingdom first, etc., etc.--what's the point if it all becomes so completely immaterial that we aren't even permitted the memories of it all? What if we resemble dear old Mom in having no picture of what has gone on before to sustain us or to learn from. What if we didn't even remember who our loved ones were, particularly our parents, siblings, spouse, children, friends? This would be called senility here on earth. Are we to take on celestial Alzheimer's in the eternal state?

There is very little hard biblical evidence to support this speculation. But what there is supports my theory, I think, that we go into the afterlife (better, the next part of life) with memories intact. Consider:

1. Depictions of the followers of God in the heavenly city typically include much praising of God as the Redeemer, and Jesus as the one slain for sin, and such like. None of this would make any sense if one had no idea what one was redeemed from, or what sin is, particularly my own.

2. While one has to be very careful with apocalyptic language, Revelation chap. 6 refers to the souls of martyrs who were asking how long they had to wait to see vindication for their earthly treatment.

3. There are references to the dead standing before a large set of ledgers, which are opened to see if one's name is written there, and so on. Again this is colourful language used for effect, but it still suggests that there is some self-awareness on our part, at least to the extent that we know who we are and the significance of one's name appearing.

4. Heaven is referred to in the Old Testament as Jacob's rest. "Rest from what?", one must ask. Presumably part of the enjoyment of rest is to remember the opposite.

5. St. Paul refers to our actual activity on earth and whether it stands up to certain tests of its usefulness in Kingdom building (1 Corinthians 3:11-13 "For no one can lay any foundation other than the one we already have--Jesus Christ. Anyone who builds on that foundation may use a variety of materials--gold, silver, jewels, wood, hay, or straw. But on the judgment day, fire will reveal what kind of work each builder has done. The fire will show if a person's work has any value.) I can't imagine how this would constitute a learning opportunity if we hadn't a clue what is being judged (see also Ecclesiastes 12:14).

While it would be difficult to build a convincing case on the above, I am sufficiently comfortable with the biblical evidence and just sheer logic to assume that there is continuity between our time as citizens of God's kingdom on earth, and the ongoing life of the kingdom thereafter.

Consequently, I dismiss the idea that everyone shows up in the great hereafter on identical terms. I believe that exclamations will range from (to quote Simeon in Luke 2:30 as he held the baby Jesus), "...my eyes have seen your salvation", to "Who the hell's the big guy and what's he doing sitting on that enormous white armchair."
If we start our next phase as Kingdom of God citizens with different understandings of God's character, will, and ways with his people, what comes next?

Be patient. I'll try to think of something.

Thursday, December 15, 2011

Heaven is a wonderful place, filled with glory and grace.....or is it?

Before going on with my speculation on matters of accountability and life eternal, I want to stop for a moment and think about what heaven is like. Growing up, all my wife could imagine was a scene of Corinthian columns and great bowls of grapes. For others, it's wings and harps. Some people imagine a prolonged church service with much antiphonal singing and the throwing of crowns toward the Great White Throne like a game of lawn darts. Streets of gold, considerable jewelery, and large mansions characterized Sunday School songs.

No wonder we get these sorts of reactions to life in heavenly realms:

"I have read descriptions of Paradise that would make any sensible person stop wanting to go there." Charles de Secondat

"It is a curious thing that every creed promises a paradise which will be absolutely uninhabitable for anyone of civilized taste." Evelyn Waugh

"The joys of heaven are for most of us, in our present condition, an acquired taste." CS Lewis

"In Heaven, all the interesting people are missing." Friedrich Nietzsche

"Go to Heaven for the climate, Hell for the company." Mark Twain

"I don't believe in an afterlife, so I don't have to spend my whole life fearing hell, or fearing heaven even more. For whatever the tortures of hell, I think the boredom of heaven would be even worse." Isaac Asimov


Heaven--not a place for those craving stimulation, civilized living, or conviviality. Why do the depictions of heaven make people come to such conclusions?

The difficulty is that there is no factual description of heaven anywhere in the Bible. St. Paul had his chance, because he once died or otherwise had an out of body experience, and came back from heaven saying he wasn't permitted to discuss it (2 Corinthians 12:2-4). What descriptions there are, are couched in apocalyptic language that is never to be taken literally.

That leaves us to speculate. Which is what I'll do next.

Tuesday, December 13, 2011

Is there accountability in the life to come? - New Testament indications

When we were looking to buy property I had this overzealous realtor show us what can only be described as a totally worn-out old farm. I mean the land had just been worked to death. The weeds were hardly even growing.

The smiling super salesman said, “Now really, all this land needs is a little water, a nice cool breeze and some good people.”

I replied, “Yeah, I agree, but couldn't the same be said of Hell?”


Discussions of accountability, from a religious point of view, usual take two forms. One is accountability for our actions as those who profess to believe in some higher power or creed and the requisite behavioural choices that accompany that belief. The WWJD (What Would Jesus Do?) fad illustrates how people try to hold others accountable for their actions.

The other form has to do with ultimate destiny. If one fails to make the proper life-changing choice to follow Jesus (or Allah, etc., etc.), one will suffer eternal punishment. An old preacher from my young days used to urge people to repent by shouting, "Turn or burn!"

What I've been asking myself is, if membership in the Kingdom of God is the default position for his created beings, and one has to fight one's way out of the Kingdom, rather than into it, and if Hell is a metaphor for finality rather than a real abode for the damned, in what way are we held accountable on earth for our choices and our actions?

Or to put it another way, if only a life of grievous and persistent sinning that renders a person unforgivable (see my posts in August-September/2011 on falling from grace) keeps us from eternal life with God, and if an afterlife of torment is not to be feared, why shouldn't I live the typical kind of life that doesn't necessarily "seek first the Kingdom of God", having the confidence that the slate will be wiped clean one day when we enter the heavenly state? I'll be there at the starting line with Billy Graham on my left, Mother Teresa on my right, and Bill Clinton two lanes over (beside Monica Lewinsky this time, rather than facing her).

I have already posted elsewhere why being a Christian is different from, and better than, being a member of God's Kingdom. Not better in the sense that this makes a person more meritorious in some way--a cut above, and all that. We're all sinners saved by grace, to use old fashioned terminology. Rather I mean that Christianity, to my way of thinking, is what God wants us to embrace. It is this kind of relationship with him that allows us to know him best in this life. Christianity is the best explanation we have as earth-bound humans, seeing through a glass darkly, of who God is, his will, his way of dealing with us, his love for us, his mercy and grace, and so on.

But Christianity is more than just a set of beliefs to which one gives assent. It requires a commitment that St. Paul compared to running a very difficult race. Jesus compared it to living a life of denial of some aspects of one's own preferences, if called upon to do so, in order to walk a narrower road. It brings with it a ethical system that sometimes requires God's help to live up to. That help is often mediated through friends and family who keep us accountable.

But again I say, why bother. Isn't heaven the great equalizer where we all start afresh? Why all the struggle, giving things up, taking on new priorities in this life when none of it is of any consequence in the life to come?


That's what I'll try to tackle next.

Friday, December 2, 2011

Where was I before life intervened for a moment?

As I was saying, at some point I decided to strike out on my own (well, not entirely on my own. I do have a degree in biblical studies, patiently--if at times futilely--taught to me by some very nice and generally intelligent professors), and see where I got to. I suppose it is my good fortune that this blog does not have a wide followership (about 1700 page views thus far), giving me the liberty of wearing a theological lampshade on my head with no one noticing.

I started off with one of the two more controversial positions of orthodox Christianity, the doctrine of eternal punishment (aka Hell, the Lake of Fire, Gehenna, and so on) for the damned. Associated with this is the belief that Hell is the default position for every individual unless they consciously accept the Christian faith.

[The other position I refer to above is the problem of evil and suffering and how it can be consistent with the belief in an all-loving, all-knowing, all-powerful, and merciful God.]

I concluded, along with such heretics as Billy Graham, that knowledge of Christ or the Christian message is not a necessary requirement for entry into God's kingdom. Further, I confirmed the belief that I have had for a long time (as did other questionable parties like the late John Stott) that Hell is to be understood metaphorically. These posts were written during the month of April 2011.

I went even further in May and June, concluding that kingdom of God membership is our right as God's created beings. In other words, being a part of God's kingdom is not something we have to earn through the exercise of faith. Quite to the contrary, it is a privilege we would have to forfeit through something else.

What that 'something else' is was explored in August and September (July being a bit of a write-off due to a couple of lovely vacation periods) where I try to imagine what it would mean to commit the 'unpardonable sin' of blaspheming the Holy Spirit.

Somewhere in there (well, in the month of June if I have to be specific) I discussed why one would bother to be a Christian at all, or encourage others to become one, if most people are going to "make it" anyway. I think I came up with what I hope is a sufficiently compelling answer that we should continue to take Jesus seriously when he tells us to go into all the world and proclaim the Gospel (imagine not taking Christ seriously!).

All of this speculation led me back to daily living. If God does not really hold Hell over our heads as a combination of stick (you're going there unless...) and carrot (this is what I've saved you from, so you'd better start acting like this...), then how does he hold us accountable for all of these free choices he permits us to make?

That led me in October to look at issues of accountability. This is where I was stuck in the usual theological goo when the civic election intervened and I digressed a bit into issues of letting one's faith influence one's political decisions in a secular and pluralistic school system.

I guess it's time to get back to that topic. Praying that the quicksand won't take me down, this is where I will now spend a little more time.